Purpose This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Families’ Importance in Nursing Care-Nurses’ Attitudes (FINC-NA) instrument developed by Saveman et al.
Methods The 222 pediatric nurses’ data were collected from 13 hospitals in South Korea and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the Cronbach’s ⍺ in SPSS software. The AMOS program was used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis of construct validity.
Results Of the 26 initial items, 24 were ultimately selected after evaluating content validity, construct validity, and reliability. The following 6 factors were included in the Korean version of the Families’ Importance in Nursing Care-Pediatric Nurses’ Attitudes (KFINC-PNA): family as a ‘conversational partner’, ‘participant in care’, ‘supporter for the nurse’, ‘burden’, ‘recipient of empowerment’, and ‘its own resource’.
Conclusion The KFINC-PNA was partially modified to explain differences in language and culture, but its validity and reliability were verified. Pediatric nurses’ attitudes can be assessed using the KFINC-PNA, and adjustments to the care of hospitalized children and their families can be made based on these items. We recommend developing and verifying intervention methods that will improve family-centered care for hospitalized children and their families.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A framework to improve family involvement in the hospital nursing care of an autistic child Neil A. Williams, Dudu G. Sokhela, Thembelihle S.P. Ngxongo Curationis.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Nursing Role in Managing Care for Patients Without Family Support Hadiya Saray Suwailem Al-Shammari, Nefayed Aldahw S Alhazmi, Mohammed Hameed Hamed Alzaidi, Abdullah Ibrahim Alothman, Alsultan, Mohammed Abdulrahman A, Mona Abdullah Husain Alanazi, Badriah Ali Alshamrani, Faizah Saleh Dhahawi Alanazi, Dalal Fal International Journal of Computational and Experim.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Nurses’ Attitudes Toward the Importance of Families in Nursing Care: A Multinational Comparative Study Lisa A. Cranley, Simon Ching Lam, Sarah Brennenstuhl, Zarina Nahar Kabir, Anne-Marie Boström, Angela Yee Man Leung, Hanne Konradsen Journal of Family Nursing.2022; 28(1): 69. CrossRef
Wise Infant Development®: creation of a software for teaching in pediatric nursing education Wesley Soares de Melo, Isabelle e Silva Sousa, Samara Pereira Souza Mariano, Aglauvanir Soares Barbosa, Dayllanna Stefanny Lopes Lima Feitosa, Vanessa Emille Carvalho de Sousa Freire, Emanuella Silva Joventino Melo, Flávia Paula Magalhães Monteiro Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the Influences of Nurses’ Partnership with Parents, Attitude to Families’ Importance in Nursing Care, and Professional Self-Efficacy on Quality of Pediatric Nursing Care: A Path Model So Yeon Yoo, Haeryun Cho International Journal of Environmental Research an.2020; 17(15): 5452. CrossRef
Canadian Hospital and Home Visiting Nurses’ Attitudes Toward Families in Transitional Care: A Descriptive Comparative Study Lisa Hoplock, Michelle Lobchuk, Leslie Dryburgh, Nicole Shead, Rashid Ahmed Journal of Family Nursing.2019; 25(3): 370. CrossRef
PURPOSE This study was done to evaluate the validity of the Korean - Child Development Review in screening children with developmental risks. METHOD The participants in the study were 172 children aged 6-75 months old and their parents. Data were collected by questionnaire or interview. Korean Denver II and Bayley test were administered with K-CDR for validation of children who were referred for developmental assessment at D University Hospital or public health center. The data were analyzed using correlation, chi-square test, and cross tab analysis. RESULTS There was a significant relationship between the K-CDR and Korean Denver II. The correlation coefficients were .42 to .61 by developmental sector. The sensitivity and specificity of K-CDR were .84 and .66 respectively when "abnormal" with MDI of Bayley test defined as lower than 85 the score which was used as a diagnosis of developmental delay. The responses to 6 questions for parents showed significant differences according to 3 groups by developmental state. Parents of children in the developmental disability group more frequently checked problems from the 26 problem checklist about their children's development and behavior. CONCLUSION The results show that K-CDR is valid and has good sensitivity and moderate specificity in screening developmental delay.